IMK Weekly
Information Service
Date: 06
November - 15 November 2001
Number: 133-134
Balfour
Beatty Opt Out of IIisu Dam Project
The news that
the British company Balfour Beatty are to opt out of a controversial dam
project in Turkey has been welcomed by naturalists and human rights organisations.
Balfour Beatty was the leading engineering company in the construction
consortium involved in the 2 billion US dollar project.
The Ilsiu
dam would not only have flooded and destroyed the homelands of 36,000 Kurds,
including historical buildings, but it would have also incited a “war for
water”. The dam would give Turkey control over the river Tigris increasing
its power over Iraq and Syria.
Blafour deny
that the protests against the project were central to their decision to
opt out. It was more to do with an extensive evaluation of the commercial
aspects of the project, its effects on the environment as well as its social
aspects. Company spokesman Tim Sharp said that Balfour Beatty’s opting
out did not necessarily mean an end to the project.
Charles Secrett,
director of Friends of the Earth and opponents of the project, claimed
it to be a clear victory which would act as a guide to any future projects
of a similar nature. Companies would demand clear guidelines on ethical
and environmental issues for any future export credits.
The Labour
member of the British parliament, Ann Clywd, also a strong opponent of
the Ilsiu project, welcomed the decision saying that the Kurds would have
been the most severely affected by the dam. The Ilsiu dam was bad for human
rights, bad for the environment, bad for the region’s peace and bad for
Britain.
The dam would
flood 300 square kilometres of which a quarter would be top rate agricultural
land. A total of 183 towns, villages and settlements would be affected
with 82 being completely and 101 partially flooded. The decision came as
a surprise to Turkey because they had expected a swift authorization of
the British export credit in recognition of Turkish support in the campaign
in Afghanistan. In contrast, Iraq and Syria should be pleased with the
decision because its means they may not become dependent on Turkey. Water
in the region is nearly as valuable as oil. (Source: BBC, 13.11.01; IMK)
Turkey Fear
Losing Power in any US Attack on Iraq
The Turkish
military have strongly urged the US against targeting Iraq after Afghanistan.
The chief of the general staff, Hüseyin Kivrikoglu, said in a visit to
a Kurdish region bordering Iraq, that “Turkey did not wish this”. As head
of the politically very influential Turkish army, Kivrikoglu is one of
the most powerful men in the country. He said that Turkey had suffered
economically by 40 billion dollars as a result of the Gulf War 10 years
ago. This alone makes Turkey against any new outbreak of war in Iraq. He
also said that military action against Baghdad was unlikely at the present
time.
However, there
is currently a lot of debate within Turkey concerning a possible US strike
against Iraq. This is reflected in the column inches in the big Turkish
daily newspapers.
Even if the
US foreign secretary Colin Powell says that there are no US plans to extend
the war to Iraq, news coverage on Iraq can be seen as building up justification
for such a strike. Reports are piling up on Iraqi production of biological
weapons and training camps for Islamic terrorists. Powell’s vague comments
that the US will direct its attention towards other terrorists who represent
a threat to the world once it has triumphed over the Al-Qeada network,
also serve to increase Turkish concerns. When the conservative New York
Times columnist William Safire plays around with the idea of re-drawing
the region’s borders to favour Turkey, a real storm is let loose in Turkey.
But it is
more than just about economic disadvantage for Turkey. A strike against
Iraq and the toppling of Saddam would result in immense changes in the
distribution of power within the region. Turkey sees a risk that the Kurdish
autonomous zone might then be able to establish itself as a free state.
From Turkey’s point of view this would have negative effects on Kurds living
in their own country, destabilising the power structures there. Turkey
have repeatedly stated that they would not tolerate such a development
and that the founding of a Kurdish state would be grounds for war. (Sources:
afp, Milliyet, 09.11.01; IMK)
A new Initiative
for the Resolution to the Democracy and Kurdish Issues for Turkey’s EU
Entry
In an interview
with the jungen Welt, the Kurdish lawyer and founding member of the Initiative
for the Resolution to the Democracy and Kurdish Issues Ibrahim Güclü, criticised
existing pro-Kurdish political parties.
“We consider
the parties that have appeared so far to be undemocratic because their
structuring is very authoritative. We take a different approach and see
ourselves firstly as if we were a collective movement. Even HADEP (Party
for a People’s Democracy) accepts the current power relationships in Turkey
and attempts to change the system from inside. The Kurdish question, however,
goes beyond the existing structures and touches on the issues of individual
and collective human rights”.
Concerning
his initiative, Güclü said: “We are not yet well known because the initiative
was only founded on 26th August of this year. It is made up of members
from various political parties and organisations, as well as artists, writers
and intellectuals. For more than one year prior to this, meetings had been
taking place in Kurdish towns and cities. It wasn’t until after such preparatory
work that we came together at a congress in Ankara on 14/15 July and agreed
on a programme. A working group will engage themselves on the conversion
of the initiative into a political party”.
Güclü considers
the constitution to be adequate in overcoming the country’s problems. According
to him: “The constitution alone makes the required opening up of society
impossible because the country’s problems can not be dealt with as long
as the basic rules of the state are not changed. This is being increasingly
acknowledged as being the case concerning Turkish society, particu-larly
by academics, writers and intellectuals. The current Turkish constitution
is aware of only one ideology, one people and one religion. The reality
is that there are many ideologies and many different ethnic groups and
nationalities such as the Kurds. We will campaign for the recognition of
this as well as the inclusion of secular principles along side the Islamic
ones.
Constitutional
change can only be a partial solution to the problem. The problem is the
whole system – the centralised structure of the Turkish state. During our
founding congress we had intensive discussion on the examples of Belgium,
Spain and Switzerland. That doesn’t mean that we wish to implement such
models of integration but they do serve as an example of peaceful coexistence
of differing groupings of people”.
The initiative
welcomes any Turkish integration into the European Union. They hope for
more control in the event of any entry. Now that discussions on EU membership
have been going on for years, Europe’s controls also have to be implemented.
Up to now, these have been way behind economic and strategic interests.
„We are for Turkey’s integration into Europe because the other option is
closer ties to countries such as Iran. But we will make it clear that integration
also brings Turkey responsibilities. In the future, we will be pointing
this out not only in Turkish towns and cities but also in Berlin, Genf
and other European cities”. (Source: junge Welt, 05.11.01)
European
Council Accuse Turkish Police of Brutality
The European
Council have again denounced acts of brutality by Turkish police. Although
the Anti-Torture Committee reported less cases of severe torture than one
year ago, they did indicate that ill treatment was still “popular practice”
particularly within the police’s anti-terror department. The report was
based on a inspection trip to Turkey by an expert delegation in July 2000.
The document could only be published now because the Anti-terror Agreement
requires consent from the Turkish government before doing so. (Source:
afp, 08.11.01)
Deaths in
Kücükarmutlu from Police Bullets
The lawyers
for the death fasters and companions killed in the November 5th police
operation in Istanbul-Kücükarmutlu, have revealed that the cause of death
was not, as the police claim, the consequences of setting themselves on
fire and carbon monoxide poisoning. Istanbul’s police chief Hasan Özdemir
and his deputy, Teran Tuna, had claimed that the bodies revealed no evidence
of bullet wounds. Fatal bullet wounds were found on three of the dead.
There was also evidence of the use of poisonous gas. The autopsy report
will be issued in around 4 weeks time in which the actual causes of death
will be stated. The Association for Contem-porary Lawyers also suspect
that chemical weapons were used during the operation.
After a more
than 1 year long hunger strike by left wing groups in Turkey, Turkish authorities
are increasingly resorting to a violent resolution to the conflict. On
13.11.2001, several hundred police moved into Kücükarmutlu, the centre
for the hunger strike movement, for the second time in 8 days. Ten people
were arrested including a German national. Police gained entry using clearance
and armoured vehicles. Tear gas was used during violent clashes and hunger
strike supporters threw Molotov cocktails and stones.
Nail Cavus
and Eyüp Samur, who had set themselves on fire in protest against the police
action in Kücükarmutlu, died on 07.11.2001 in hospital in Cerrahpasa. (Sources:
Radikal, 07.11.01; Cumhuriyet, 08.11.01; afp, 13.11.01)
Long Prison
Sentences for Death Fast Supporters
Supporters
of the hunger strikes or death fasts are at risk of receiving long-term
prison sentences. The government have presented a new law to parliament
in this respect. Supporters of the hunger strikes would be liable to 4
years imprisonment. If a hunger strike ended in death, the penalty could
be raised up to 20 years. For those smuggling banned objects such as weapons,
sharp instruments, drugs or mobile telephones into prison, the law provides
prison sentences of between 2 and 5 years. (Source: Hürriyet, 08.11.01)
Universities
Against Kurdish
The Turkish
University Council has said in a statement that they are against lessons
in Kurdish. The head of the council, Prof. Dr. Riza Ayhan, stated that
teaching in an ethnic language was unacceptable. The mother tongue of the
Turkish nation was Turkish and education programmes which destroyed the
unified structure of the state could not be tolerated. (Source: Anadolu
Ajansi, Radikal, 06.11.01)
Author and
Publisher of “The Cell” Found Guilty
The case against
Nevin Berktas, author of the book “The Cell””, and Elif Camyar, publisher
and owner of the company Yediveren, came to a close on 07.11.2001 at Istanbul’s
state security court. Both were sentenced to 45 months imprisonment in
accordance with Article 169 of the Turkish penal code. Elif Camyar was
also fined 4,152 billion Turkish Lira. State prosecutors had called for
a conviction for the offence of “Propaganda” under to Article 8/1 of the
Anti-terror law.
This case
indicates the beginning of a new phase in Turkey whereby the expression
of undesirable opinions are directly deemed as supporting terrorism. Under
the arbitrary application of Article 169, there are currently 6 cases being
heard concerning newspaper articles and 2 cases against the Human Rights
Association in Ankara and the Human Rights Foundation in Diyarbakir. Both
organisations have been charged with supporting the hunger strikes by allowing
admittance and providing medical support. The state prosecutor has called
for their closure. (Source: Evrensel, 09.11.01)
Urgent Action:
Concern for the Safety of Ms. S. Ö. and her Six Children
Eight police
officers from Diyarbakir are being brought before a court accused of torturing
a Kurdish woman. The charge is, however, only for torture and not rape.
For fear of travelling to Diyarbakir, S.Ö. was allowed to make her statement
on 02.04.2001 before a court in Istanbul were she was temporarily residing.
Ms. S. Ö.
was allegedly raped and tortured in Diyarbakir’s police headquarters in
November 1997. Following her arrest in November 1997, S.Ö. was in prison
until 24.08.2000 having been found guilty of aiding the PKK. Her husband
has been in prison for 6 years.
The Kurd S.Ö.
(32 years old, Amnesty International are aware of her full name) has again
been harassed by police to force her to withdraw her charges. Several of
her children have also now been detained with some of them being beaten.
Police appear at S.Ö.’s home in Izmir almost every week and harass her.
She is constantly being followed on the streets. She has placed charges
because of this harassment and has called for the arrest of those responsible.
Her 17-year-old
son F.Ö. was arrested a few months ago by police and released 3 days later
following intervention by the Interior Minister, a member of the parliamentary
Human Rights Commission.
During the
second week of October police arrested her 12-year-old son C.Ö. at school
accusing him of theft. They beat him on the way to the police station and
then arrested him again the following day, detaining him for 3 hours. A
week later S.Ö. was summonsed to Narlidere’s police central and requested
to withdraw her accusations. As she refused 2 police officers in civilian
clothing indirectly threatened her by saying, “We hope then that nothing
happens to you”.
On 22.10.2001
her 15-year-old daughter B.Ö. was abducted by people in civilian clothing
in a white vehicle. The abductors gagged her and bound her eyes. They then
beat her and threatened to rape and kill her and her mother. They threw
her from the vehicle after half an hour. When S.Ö. and B.Ö. went to the
local police station to report the events, they were held there until 5.00am
the next day. The police asked how they could know that B.Ö’s abductors
were police officers. The police also suggested that C.Ö. should withdraw
the statement he made against the police who had beaten him. (UA 19/01-1
ai-Index: EUR 44//082/2001, 12th. November 2001 – bs; further information
on UA 19/01 EUR 44/005/2001, 25th January 2001)
Urgent Action:
Concern for the Safety of Sefik Yildrim
Amnesty International
are concerned for the safety of Sefik Yildrim (34) who has been arrested
twice within a week. He is currently being held in the gendarmerie headquarters
in Diyarbakir and has no contact to the outside world.
On 30.10.2001
Sefik Yildrim was taken into police custody in Cermik in the province of
Diyarbakir, and charged with having “con-nections to the PKK”. According
to reports, he has been tortured with electric shocks and is suffering
from health problems as a result.
Sefik Yildrim
was brought before a judge on 02.11.2001 with the state prosecutor applying
for his detention. However, the authorities released him at 17.00 on the
same day but re-arrested him on 06.11.2001 following a raid on his house.
His family were informed that he was being held in a gendarme station.
The authorities have not given the reasons for his arrest. (UA 284/01
ai-Index: EUR 44/081/2001 7th November 2001 – bs)
Urgent Action:
Bedia Ergün,
Özgür Kilic, Cem Arikan and around 1,000 Others Including Afghans and Iraqi
Kurds at Risk of Deportation from Greece
A ship sailing
under a Turkish flag with around 1,000 people on board and adrift in Greek
waters following mechanical failure, was towed by Greek coastguards to
the island of Zakynthos on 05.11.2001. On the following day the Greek government
let it be known that they intended to deport the majority of the ship’s
passengers back to their homelands, apparently without even giving them
the opportunity to apply for asylum. The 3 people named above and possibly
many others, are at risk of torture and other human rights violations if
deported back to their homes. According to reports, the majority of the
passengers are Iraqi Kurds and Afghans. The ship’s crew abandoned the ship
after a fire broke out in the engine room leading to mechanical failure.
Bedia Ergün
and Özgür Kilic were released from prison in Turkey because of health problems
after they became death fasters in the hunger strike action against the
transfer of political prisoners into new penal institutions. At their trial
they were found guilty of being members of the armed opposition group “Marxist-Leninist
Communist Party” (MLKP). Cem Arikan joined them in fleeing from Turkey.
Bedia Ergün and Özgür Kilic are apparently now being held in Zakynthos’s
police station.
To the question
of whether the passengers from the ship would be permitted to submit asylum
applications, a government spokesman said at a press conference on 06.11.200
that these were illegal immigrants and not political refugees. Greek authorities
did allow around 200 people, mostly pregnant women and children suffering
from hunger and thirst, to come onto land to receive treatment. (UA 282/01
ai-Index: EUR 25/008/2001 6th November 2001 – md)
Police Officer
Charged with Torture
On 08.11.2001,
a case was heard before Istanbul’s state security court against Ayhan Tokcan,
former deputy police chief in Kagithane (Istanbul), on charges of abduction
and blackmail. He denied the charges and said that he had been tortured
during his interrogation, e.g by having his testicles crushed and receiving
electric shocks. (Source: Milliyet, 09.11.01)
Publication
of EU Progress Report
The progress
report published on 13.11.2001 praised Turkey’s constitutional reforms
but were critical that Turkey had not fulfilled the Copenhagen criteria.
Included in
the report’s criticisms was the failure to completely abolish the death
penalty and that there were still restrictions on the basic, linguistic
and cultural rights of the 12 million Kurds living in the country.
The Turkish
Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of State for EU Affairs Mesut Yilmaz
accepted the EU’s critical assessment re-garding inadequacies in human
rights and democratisation. The progress report was to be seen as positive
but some aspects of it did overshadow his optimism. He commented that none
of the reforms were really praised in the report, and that this would not
motivate those who had worked so hard on the EU integration process. Yilmaz
said that it was now time for the coalition and opposition to adapt the
law to the constitutional changes. Yilmaz expressed his understanding for
the criticisms in the progress report: “Of course we must accept criticism
if the necessary progress is not made with reforms only being partially
carried out”. He made an appeal not to complain or become weary but to
undertake the steps which would enable negotiations to eventually commence.
The Turkish
foreign ministry stated that the progress report had been more careful
in its choice of words than last years. Turkey’s deficiencies were expressed
in a more cautious tone. The foreign ministry also called for the implementation,
without delay, of the other required steps. The further steps will be discussed
with Turkey at the EU summit in Laeken on 14th and 15th December 2001,
which could lead to a speeding of activity in Turkey.
The constitutional
reforms were praised positively in the report as a step towards fulfilling
the Copenhagen criteria. Now the law has to be adapted. Certain deficiencies
in respect of basic rights and freedoms have to be rectified.
By March 2002
a second National Programme will have been prepared which will take into
consideration EU conformity. (Sources: TDN, 15.11.01; IMK)
Kurdish
Prime Minister Visits Britain
Nechirvan
Barzani, the prime minister of the Kurdish regional government in Arbil,
has visited Britain accompanied by high level governmental representatives
of the Kurdish regional government. Minister of State Ben Bradshaw received
the Prime Minister. Political and social developments in the so-called
“safe havens” were assessed in talks with governmental and parliamentary
rep-resentatives, as well as current issues and requirements. Development
towards a blossoming, democratic and pluralistic society was unanimously
expressed. Barzani thanked the British government and its people for its
support and protection in the region. He pointed to the need for further
permanent protection by the international community. Guarantees on the
Kurdish share of the Oil for Food Program was of great importance to the
region’s economic stability and the democratic process within southern
Kurdistan. Prime Minister Barzani said that the younger generation would
leave Kurdistan because they have no certain political future there. The
Kurdish people were therefore calling for international recognition of
the Kurdistan region. (Sources: PE der KRG (Arbil) in Großbritannien, 07.11.01;
KurdishMedia.com, 11.11.01)
Dr. Barham
Salih Meets UN Chief Coordinator for Iraq
To coordinate
cooperation of UN agencies with the Kurdish regional government in Suleymani,
its Prime Minister Dr. Barham Salih and cabinet members met with representatives
and agencies of the UN. Taking part in the talks were Tun Myat, UN chief
coordinator for Iraq, Jon Almstrom UN chief coordinator for northern Iraq
(southern Kurdistan) as well as UN employees from Baghdad, Arbil and Suleymani.
Tun Myat promised better coordination especially in the areas of medical
provision, training and agriculture. (Source: KurdishMedia.com, 08.11.01)
Mass Execution
of Political Prisoners in Iraqi Prisons
An Iraqi opposition
group has reported that Iraqi authorities executed 15 political prisoners
in Kirkuk and buried them in a mass grave west of Tobzawa Garnison near
Kirkuk. According to the Turkmen Islamic Union in Damascus, the executions
allegedly took place following a wave of detentions of people who were
in possession of fly-sheets hostile to the Saddam Hussein clique.
Al-Mutamar,
the daily newspaper from the INC (Iraqi National Congress), reported that
the cleansing programme taking place in prisons had cost the lives of 325
prisoners over the past few days. 152 prisoners have allegedly been executed
alone in Baghdad’s prison. The INC have the names of the victims.
Following
a visit to the Al-Macasib prison on 18.10.2001, Saddam’s younger son Qusay
ordered the speeding up of the execution of political prisoners. One week
later 11 political prisoners were executed under the leadership of the
officer for security Sahib Alan Al-Tickriti. They were buried under supervision
from Hisham Tari, another officer for security.
According
to the newspaper many political prisoners have died as a result of illness
and the refusal of medical treatment. A further 40 political prisoners
are believed to be on a death list.
Also allegedly
executed are 4 high-ranking officers from the KUDDUS army and 3 air force
officers who took part in an attempted coup in 1996. The KUDDUS army was
specially formed for the liberation of Jerusalem and Palestine. The 4 officers
were arrested because they had released secret plans for a KUDDUS strike
against Kurdistan. (Source:KurdishMedia.com, 09.11.01)
Iraqi Troops
Assemble on Kurdish Border
Iraq have
completed installing troops along the border to southern Kurdistan. Infantry
brigades, artillery and tanks all have taken up positions. The troops are
concentrated near the province of Dohuk and in areas around the city of
Kirkuk. Elite units of the Republican Guard have in particular taken up
positions outside the oil rich city of Kirkuk. Iraqi troops are also positioned
near the capital city of Arbil. Units of the Fedayeen Saddam are positioned
along the main roads to the Kurdish region. Military equipment, including
tanks, heavy artillery and anti aircraft missiles are allegedly already
in position on the road from Mossul to Dohuk.
Travellers
are being searched at a number of check points, with their identities being
taken and some of them being questioned. Kurds and Arabs who do not live
in the Kurdish regions are not being allowed through. Roads to the Kurdish
region are closed to traffic from 19.00. Mobile check points stop and control
vehicles and their occupants.
On the orders
of Saddam, oil smuggling is strictly forbidden meaning that southern Kurdistan
is suffering from an acute lack of oil.
The real reasons
for the troop movements are not known but it is suspected that Iraq are
preparing themselves for a US strike following the 11th September. Kurds
in southern Kurdistan are concerned that through the troop build-up Saddam
could march into the region governed by Kurds and take over control there.
Another option might be to seal border openings from southern Kurdistan
to Turkey or Syria thereby economically strangling the region. Turkish
troops are at the same time assembling at the triangle of nations of Iran,
Iraq and Turkey. Saddam fears that the US may use the Kurdish region as
a base for attacks on Iraq. (Source: Iraq Press, 13.11.01)
Persistence
Leads to Success: Emder Reformists Celebrate Positive Outcome of the Brother
Cicek’s Asylum Case
“The Long
Wait Was Worth It” was written on a banner above the altar of the parish
church “Gröne Stee” in Conrebbersweg in Germany. It referred to the three
and a half years of hope for 2 Kurdish brothers with Turkish nationality,
Ahmet and Mehmet Cicek, to whom the Reformed Church in Emder had given
church asylum.
Priest Bert
Gedenk preached to full pews because many had supported the Cicek brother’s
case and had now come to celebrate. Gedenk reviewed the events of the previous
years. The brothers had been about to be deported from Germany. Gedenk
spoke of the apparently insurmountable problems within German asylum law,
a law which according to him “had been made unrecognisable through amendments
over the pat years”. He also spoke of discouragement and the hostility
that had to be stood against from within his own parish. But the aim of
saving 2 men had been worth the efforts of many people.
Gedenk remembered
the doctors who had treated the men without charge, the youths who had
provided entertainment during the period of church asylum and those who
had provided the men with financial support. “The sum of all these efforts
may not have guaranteed success”, said Gedenk, but the committed attitude
of everybody had enabled “ways to be found that had previously not been
seen”, despite all the rejection notices.
The saving
judgement was known since the beginning of September. Oldenburg’s administrative
court granted the Cicek brothers residency permits.
Amongst those
present was the former refugee envoy for the district of Aurich, Carl Osterwald.
He had put Ahmet and Mehmet Cicek in touch with the Emder parish when they
were seeking asylum. In his speech he remembered this and expressed his
desire for peace, an attitude that had come about from his experience of
war. He expressed his support for all those who chose, like the Cicek brothers,
to refuse military service in Turkey. (Sources: Emder Zeitung, 05.11.2001)
Dear Readers,
Please visit
our Web Site where you will find interesting articles which we were unable
to print here because of lack of space. You will also find the complete
Urgent Actions from Amnesty International along with recommendations and
addresses .
Visit our Homepage
at www.kurden.de. We have again made interesting articles available to
you there.
|